Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to McKesson Corporation
How McKesson Corporation stacks up
MCK · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #204 of 455 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MCK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 54.8% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MCK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 8.8% | 11.0% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 54.8% | 21.2% | 68% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 13.1% | 11.0% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MCK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 201 | 635M USD | 70 | 39 | |
| 201 | 10.6B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 201 | 595M USD | 70 | 29 | |
| 204 | 395M USD | 69 | 30 | |
| 204 | 116.5B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 204 | 4.0B USD | 69 | 56 | |
| 204 | 504M USD | 69 | 24 | |
| 204 | 49.1B USD | 69 | 69 | |
| 209 | 773M USD | 68 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score