Ranked #285 of 362 · scores higher than 21% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
85 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including MCD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 9 among Consumer Cyclical companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
▼Shareholders' equity is negative, so debt/equity counts as among the highest in its peer group. Debt / equity: — vs peer median 0.46×
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 72% of peers. Current ratio: 1.08× vs peer median 1.49×
▲a share price that has swung less with the market: stronger than 63% of peers. Beta: 0.41 vs peer median 0.63
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MCD
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 320 reported
Not reported
1.02×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 349 reported
0.41
1.14
94%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported
1.08×
1.47×
28%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
