Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAT · against 312 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #163 of 313 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including MAT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 303 reported | 1.37× | 0.59× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 303 reported | 0.70 | 0.79 | 57% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 301 reported | 1.90× | 1.48× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 159 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 40 | 35 | |
| 160 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 40 | 58 | |
| 161 | 32.4B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 39 | 61 | |
| 162 | 2.4B USD | 39 | 65 | |
| 163 | 4.4B USD | 39 | 53 | |
| 164 | 2.2B USD | 39 | 64 | |
| 165 | 4.9B USD | 39 | 51 | |
| 166 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 39 | 65 | |
| 167 | 81.8B THB (≈$2.3B) | 38 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score