Ranked #244 of 251 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
26 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including MARA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -79.6% vs peer median 1.2%
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on equity: -105.6% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MARA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MARA
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 220 reported
-58.3%
10.2%
0%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 38 reported
-366.3%
27.6%
3%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 251 reported
-79.6%
1.2%
0%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 250 reported
-105.6%
10.0%
0%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 259 reported
40.1%
0.0%
76%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
