Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marriott International, Inc.
How Marriott International, Inc. stacks up
MAR · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #191 of 356 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 4.7% | 5.9% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 9.2% | 6.2% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 5.5% | 4.1% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 187 | 2.5B USD | 56 | 62 | |
| 187 | 193M USD | 56 | 34 | |
| 191 | 8.6B USD | 55 | 49 | |
| 191 | 5.5B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 191 | 108.6B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 191 | 4.3B USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 195 | 1.2B USD | 54 | 54 | |
| 195 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 195 | 690M USD | 54 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score