Ranked #150 of 151 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
30 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including MANU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 1 among Communication Services companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 97% of peers. Current ratio: 0.33× vs peer median 1.38×
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 95% of peers. Debt / equity: 4.60× vs peer median 0.37×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MANU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MANU
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 135 reported
4.60×
0.66×
10%
33%
BetaLower is better · 142 reported
Not reported
0.91
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 150 reported
0.33×
1.28×
3%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
