Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAMA · against 280 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #209 of 281 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score34 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including MAMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | MAMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 275 reported | 1.2% | 4.5% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 285 reported | 3.5% | 8.8% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | 2.8% | 6.3% | 32% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 276 reported | 27.6% | 63.8% | 15% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 2 | 87.0B INR (≈$1.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 2 | 8.06T IDR (≈$500M) | 98 | 84 | |
| 5 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 201 | 737.9B ARS (≈$738M) | 22 | 34 | |
| 206 | 6.0B CNY (≈$835M) | 21 | 51 | |
| 206 | 467M USD | 21 | 23 | |
| 208 | 2.2B CNY (≈$315M) | 20 | 18 | |
| 209 | 607M USD | 19 | 67 | |
| 210 | 2.3B CNY (≈$325M) | 18 | 31 | |
| 211 | 3.9B CNY (≈$543M) | 17 | 23 | |
| 211 | 963M USD | 17 | 29 | |
| 211 | 1.1B USD | 17 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score