Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAGN · against 274 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #107 of 275 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MAGN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | MAGN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 265 reported | -26.3% | 4.5% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 280 reported | 15.7% | 9.3% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | Not reported | 5.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 267 reported | 239.1% | 65.4% | 97% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$218M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$223M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 103 | 6.3B HKD (≈$808M) | 64 | 53 | |
| 103 | 1.2B SAR (≈$329M) | 64 | 52 | |
| 103 | 107.0B JPY (≈$727M) | 64 | 67 | |
| 103 | 70.5B JPY (≈$479M) | 64 | 80 | |
| 107 | 426M USD | 63 | 48 | |
| 107 | 753M EUR (≈$828M) | 63 | 63 | |
| 109 | 39.0B JPY (≈$265M) | 62 | 70 | |
| 109 | 68.6B JPY (≈$467M) | 62 | 59 | |
| 111 | 50.7B JPY (≈$345M) | 61 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score