Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Macy's, Inc.
How Macy's, Inc. stacks up
M · against 252 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 253 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including M · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 27.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 84% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 22.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = M, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | M | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 252 reported | 11.4% | 5.2% | 91% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 256 reported | 14.0% | 9.2% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | 16.7% | 6.3% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 255 reported | 79.0% | 42.9% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around M| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 7 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 8 | 26.9B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 95 | 84 | |
| 8 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 8 | 37.4B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 95 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score