Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Macy's, Inc.
How Macy's, Inc. stacks up
M · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #195 of 356 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including M · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -2.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 64% of peers. Revenue growth: 0.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 56.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = M, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | M | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 0.4% | 5.9% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 56.1% | 6.2% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -2.4% | 4.1% | 19% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around M| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 191 | 4.3B USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 195 | 1.2B USD | 54 | 54 | |
| 195 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 195 | 690M USD | 54 | 15 | |
| 195 | 6.2B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 195 | 186.1B USD | 54 | 49 | |
| 195 | 256M USD | 54 | 29 | |
| 195 | 4.3B USD | 54 | 40 | |
| 202 | 253M USD | 53 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score