Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lifezone Metals Limited
How Lifezone Metals Limited stacks up
LZM · against 414 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #401 of 415 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score55 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including LZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 100% of peers. Operating margin: -1742.2% vs peer median 7.6%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on invested capital: -27.1% vs peer median 6.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -7.8% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LZM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 387 reported | -27.1% | 3.8% | 3% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 404 reported | -1742.2% | 4.3% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 405 reported | -7.8% | 1.3% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 399 reported | -23.8% | 2.8% | 9% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 433 reported | 36.4% | 17.4% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LZM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 436M GBP (≈$566M) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 934M AUD (≈$617M) | 98 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$673M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 1 | 635M USD | 98 | 79 | |
| 401 | 562M USD | 0 | 6 | |
| 401 | 398M AUD (≈$263M) | 0 | 31 | |
| 401 | 429M USD | 0 | 16 | |
| 401 | 294M USD | 0 | 37 | |
| 401 | 343M USD | 0 | 22 | |
| 401 | 577M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 401 | 673M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 401 | 431M USD | 0 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score