Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to La-Z-Boy Incorporated
How La-Z-Boy Incorporated stacks up
LZB · against 496 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #160 of 497 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including LZB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LZB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LZB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 494 reported | 6.4% | 4.7% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 507 reported | 12.7% | 9.0% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 8.2% | 7.0% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 494 reported | 81.2% | 56.4% | 68% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LZB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 160 | 3.8B SAR (≈$1.0B) | 68 | 57 | |
| 160 | 159.4B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 68 | 41 | |
| 160 | 963M USD | 68 | 59 | |
| 160 | 947M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 68 | 59 | |
| 160 | 1.2B USD | 68 | 46 | |
| 165 | 71.9B INR (≈$862M) | 67 | 71 | |
| 165 | 808M USD | 67 | 38 | |
| 165 | 1.0B USD | 67 | 60 | |
| 165 | 892M USD | 67 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score