Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LZB · against 500 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #347 of 501 · scores higher than 31% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)47 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including LZB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LZB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 492 reported | 0.53× | 0.48× | 47% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 490 reported | 1.25 | 0.51 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 489 reported | 1.67× | 1.48× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.7B CNY (≈$659M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 4 | 5.4B CNY (≈$758M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 343 | 1.3B USD | 36 | 48 | |
| 344 | 1.60T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 36 | ||
| 345 | 2.0B USD | 36 | 64 | |
| 346 | 17.8B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 36 | 38 | |
| 347 | 1.2B USD | 35 | 46 | |
| 348 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 35 | 18 | |
| 349 | 10.6B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 35 | 42 | |
| 350 | 137.4B JPY (≈$934M) | 35 | 32 | |
| 351 | 134.3B INR (≈$1.6B) | 35 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score