Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LVWR · against 154 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #137 of 155 · scores higher than 12% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including LVWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LVWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 144 reported | Not reported | 0.59× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 149 reported | Not reported | 0.48 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 152 reported | 3.09× | 1.52× | 84% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 3 | 607M MYR (≈$134M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 4 | 30.3B JPY (≈$206M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 5 | 511M SAR (≈$138M) | 99 | 32 | |
| 133 | 411M BRL (≈$74M) | 16 | 59 | |
| 134 | 2.1B SEK (≈$211M) | 14 | 33 | |
| 135 | 227M NZD (≈$136M) | 14 | 27 | |
| 136 | 117M EUR (≈$129M) | 13 | 35 | |
| 137 | 124M USD | 13 | 23 | |
| 138 | 242M AUD (≈$160M) | 11 | 49 | |
| 139 | 749M HKD (≈$96M) | 10 | 22 | |
| 139 | 139M AUD (≈$92M) | 10 | 21 | |
| 141 | 249M AUD (≈$164M) | 10 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score