Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Las Vegas Sands Corp.
How Las Vegas Sands Corp. stacks up
LVS · against 104 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
70/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #18 of 105 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including LVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LVS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 103 reported | 6.7% | 4.6% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 106 reported | 12.5% | 7.5% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | 10.9% | 4.6% | 91% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 99 reported | 2.3% | 22.1% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LVS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 14 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 74 | 91 | |
| 14 | 26.1B USD | 74 | 81 | |
| 17 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.7B) | 73 | 36 | |
| 18 | 19.7B USD | 70 | 62 | |
| 18 | 24.8B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 20 | 39.3B USD | 68 | 53 | |
| 21 | 271.2B MXN (≈$14.6B) | 67 | 70 | |
| 21 | 34.3B USD | 67 | 60 | |
| 21 | 13.8B USD | 67 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score