Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lufax Holding Ltd
How Lufax Holding Ltd stacks up
LU · against 120 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #110 of 121 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including LU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: -6.0% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 91% of peers. Return on assets: -1.0% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 117 reported | -6.0% | 5.2% | 9% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 62 reported | Not reported | 19.4% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 138 reported | -1.0% | 2.6% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 134 reported | -3.7% | 7.0% | 12% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 155 reported | 56.1% | 94.4% | 35% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 96 | 67 | |
| 3 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 96 | 93 | |
| 5 | 20.0B MXN (≈$1.1B) | 93 | 68 | |
| 106 | 44.7B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 12 | 29 | |
| 106 | 348M CHF (≈$400M) | 12 | 8 | |
| 108 | 572M GBP (≈$743M) | 10 | 62 | |
| 108 | 748M USD | 10 | 35 | |
| 110 | 707M USD | 8 | 48 | |
| 110 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 8 | 48 | |
| 112 | 31.7B INR (≈$381M) | 7 | 28 | |
| 113 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 6 | 23 | |
| 114 | 7.0B CNY (≈$985M) | 5 | 12 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score