Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LSCC · against 184 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 185 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 53
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including LSCC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LSCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 174 reported | 0.05× | 0.34× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 174 reported | 1.83 | 1.03 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 184 reported | 3.02× | 1.64× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 62 | 13.6B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 63 | 9.6B USD | 54 | 42 | |
| 64 | 18.8B USD | 54 | 64 | |
| 65 | 10.1B USD | 53 | 72 | |
| 66 | 15.0B USD | 53 | 47 | |
| 67 | 387.7B TWD (≈$12.0B) | 53 | 54 | |
| 68 | 691.4B TWD (≈$21.4B) | 52 | 59 | |
| 69 | 143.1B HKD (≈$18.3B) | 51 | 64 | |
| 70 | 271.6B TWD (≈$8.4B) | 51 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score