Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lesaka Technologies, Inc.
How Lesaka Technologies, Inc. stacks up
LSAK · against 484 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #117 of 485 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including LSAK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.3% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LSAK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LSAK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 469 reported | 0.8% | 1.5% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 501 reported | 13.5% | 3.9% | 85% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 7.8% | 0.9% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 477 reported | 63.5% | 45.6% | 69% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LSAK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 117 | 36.6B JPY (≈$249M) | 81 | 60 | |
| 117 | 9.7B TWD (≈$301M) | 81 | 47 | |
| 117 | 306M CAD (≈$223M) | 81 | 57 | |
| 117 | 199M EUR (≈$219M) | 81 | 53 | |
| 117 | 343M USD | 81 | 56 | |
| 117 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 81 | 80 | |
| 123 | 14.8B TWD (≈$460M) | 80 | 50 | |
| 123 | 374M USD | 80 | 35 | |
| 123 | 326M EUR (≈$358M) | 80 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score