How Lesaka Technologies, Inc. stacks up

LSAK · against 502 other Technology companies of similar size

Overall

56/ 100

Above the middle of the pack.

Ranked #137 of 503 · scores higher than 71% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

88 peers with an overall score of 50–59, including LSAK · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#117 of 485Score 81 / 100 · beats 75%Growth#46 of 485Score 83 / 100 · beats 89%Profitability#279 of 506Score 30 / 100 · beats 44%Risk#365 of 499Higher relative risk · safety 30 · beats 27%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around LSAK

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	Yuanbao Inc.YB · US-listed	500M USD	93		97	98	0 / 2
2	FTGroup Co., Ltd.2763.T · Japan	35.6B JPY (≈$242M)	92	98	—	88	0 / 2
2	Datasection Inc.3905.T · Japan	67.2B JPY (≈$457M)	92	97	98	96	0 / 2
4	Guangdong Mingzhu Group Co.,Ltd600382.SS · China	3.4B CNY (≈$482M)	91	87	99	81	0 / 2
4	ARGO GRAPHICS Inc.7595.T · Japan	85.2B JPY (≈$579M)	91	98	87	88	/ 2
⋯
137	Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Co.,Ltd.6844.T · Japan	28.2B JPY (≈$192M)	56	98	44	35	1 / 2
137	adesso SEADN1.DE · Europe	461M EUR (≈$507M)	56	86	97	36	2 / 2
137	Agora, Inc.API · US-listed	352M USD	56	41	71	23	0 / 2
137	Better Collective A/SBETCO.ST · Europe	3.7B SEK (≈$365M)	56	97	23	63	1 / 2
137	Lesaka Technologies, Inc.LSAK · US-listed	343M USD	56	81	83	30	2 / 2
147	Guangzhou Echom Sci. & Tech. Co.,Ltd002420.SZ · China	2.5B CNY (≈$345M)	55	75	74	40	2 / 2
147	Guangdong Rifeng Electric Cable Co., Ltd.002953.SZ · China	4.6B CNY (≈$639M)	55	55	50	42	0 / 2
147	Altek Corporation3059.TW · Taiwan	10.9B TWD (≈$337M)	55	77	34	46	1 / 2
147	Tazmo Co., Ltd.6266.T · Japan	45.0B JPY (≈$306M)	55	75	40	50	1 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…