Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LQDT · against 482 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #231 of 483 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 53
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)55 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including LQDT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LQDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 474 reported | 0.06× | 0.48× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 475 reported | 1.04 | 0.52 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 472 reported | 1.58× | 1.49× | 55% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 5.4B CNY (≈$758M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) | 99 | 70 | |
| 5 | 6.7B HKD (≈$861M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 227 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 54 | 68 | |
| 228 | 738M EUR (≈$812M) | 54 | 60 | |
| 229 | 2.1B CAD (≈$1.5B) | 54 | 51 | |
| 230 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 54 | 82 | |
| 231 | 1.4B USD | 53 | 62 | |
| 232 | 6.4B CNY (≈$899M) | 53 | 62 | |
| 233 | 300.2B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 53 | 59 | |
| 234 | 6.5B CNY (≈$908M) | 53 | 67 | |
| 235 | 7.1B CNY (≈$999M) | 53 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score