Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lotus Technology Inc.
How Lotus Technology Inc. stacks up
LOT · against 271 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #264 of 272 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score42 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including LOT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 99% of peers. Operating margin: -81.5% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -23.8% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on invested capital: -41.6% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LOT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LOT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 247 reported | -41.6% | 3.3% | 4% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 270 reported | -81.5% | 3.6% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 263 reported | -23.8% | 1.9% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 257 reported | Not reported | 3.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 273 reported | 9.4% | 26.3% | 12% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LOT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 6.9B TWD (≈$214M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 4 | 42.1B JPY (≈$286M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 264 | 1.9B CNY (≈$259M) | 0 | 19 | |
| 264 | 2.6B CNY (≈$371M) | 0 | 20 | |
| 264 | 163M USD | 0 | 26 | |
| 264 | 9.5B TRY (≈$284M) | 0 | 18 | |
| 264 | 188M USD | 0 | 17 | |
| 264 | 124M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 264 | 322M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 264 | 283M USD | 0 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score