Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lotus Technology Inc.
How Lotus Technology Inc. stacks up
LOT · against 264 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #73 of 265 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including LOT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -43.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 278.7% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LOT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LOT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 270 reported | -43.8% | 0.8% | 1% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | Not reported | 0.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 263 reported | 278.7% | 1.0% | 100% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LOT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 4 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 98 | 88 | |
| 5 | 42.7B JPY (≈$290M) | 96 | 80 | |
| 69 | 54.3B JPY (≈$369M) | 66 | 56 | |
| 69 | 2.0B BRL (≈$353M) | 66 | 73 | |
| 71 | 326M USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 72 | 44.0B JPY (≈$299M) | 63 | 62 | |
| 73 | 188M USD | 62 | 17 | |
| 74 | 52.6B JPY (≈$358M) | 61 | 48 | |
| 75 | 33.9B JPY (≈$231M) | 60 | 77 | |
| 76 | 2.5B CNY (≈$354M) | 59 | 73 | |
| 76 | 106M CHF (≈$122M) | 59 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score