Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LNTH · against 210 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #73 of 211 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score32 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including LNTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | LNTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 208 reported | 4.1% | 2.6% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 210 reported | 5.9% | 4.6% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 5.9% | 1.2% | 91% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 209 reported | 19.9% | 24.0% | 44% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 89.5B HKD (≈$11.5B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 4 | 10.4B USD | 96 | 64 | |
| 5 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 76 | |
| 73 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 65 | 65 | |
| 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.42T JPY (≈$9.6B) |
| 65 |
| 50 |
| 73 | 936.1B JPY (≈$6.4B) | 65 | 80 |
| 73 | 679.6B INR (≈$8.2B) | 65 | 77 |
| 73 | 6.6B USD | 65 | 61 |
| 73 | 12.7B AUD (≈$8.4B) | 65 | 38 |
| 79 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 64 | 47 |
| 80 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 63 | 62 |
| 80 | 25.3B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 63 | 68 |