Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alliant Energy Corporation
How Alliant Energy Corporation stacks up
LNT · against 60 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #43 of 61 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including LNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -2.7% vs peer median 1.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 67% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 61 reported | 6.9% | 6.3% | 53% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 55 reported | -2.7% | 6.2% | 26% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 60 reported | 1.9% | 2.7% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.3B GBP (≈$14.7B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 15.4B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 4 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 96 | 61 | |
| 4 | 921.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 39 | 22.0B USD | 56 | 44 | |
| 40 | 200.5B CNY (≈$28.1B) | 55 | 44 | |
| 41 | 19.7B USD | 52 | 46 | |
| 41 | 15.5B USD | 52 | 72 | |
| 43 | 18.7B USD | 51 | 37 | |
| 44 | 2.41T INR (≈$29.0B) | 44 | 69 | |
| 45 | 45.0B MYR (≈$9.9B) | 39 | 39 | |
| 46 | 2.24T JPY (≈$15.2B) | 38 | 55 | |
| 47 | 10.1B USD | 37 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score