Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas
How BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas stacks up
LND · against 258 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Profitability
7/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #230 of 259 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including LND · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 7?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 93% of peers. Operating margin: -5.2% vs peer median 7.6%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 89% of peers. Return on assets: -1.3% vs peer median 4.0%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LND, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LND | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 236 reported | Not reported | 4.9% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 257 reported | -5.2% | 5.2% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 251 reported | -1.3% | 2.9% | 18% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 250 reported | -4.3% | 5.6% | 20% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 259 reported | 7.2% | 27.8% | 9% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LND| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.2B JPY (≈$376M) | 99 | 87 | |
| 1 | 14.8B THB (≈$413M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.5B TWD (≈$201M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 5 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 97 | 67 | |
| 225 | 567M USD | 8 | 16 | |
| 225 | 229M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 225 | 308M NZD (≈$185M) | 8 | 18 | |
| 230 | 3.9B CNY (≈$541M) | 7 | 15 | |
| 230 | 309M USD | 7 | 16 | |
| 230 | 340M SGD (≈$258M) | 7 | 44 | |
| 230 | 172M USD | 7 | 63 | |
| 234 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 6 | 4 | |
| 234 | 8.1B TWD (≈$251M) | 6 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score