Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lockheed Martin Corporation
How Lockheed Martin Corporation stacks up
LMT · against 38 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 39 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including LMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 4.2% | 3.4% | 82% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 5.9% | 5.6% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 5.9% | 3.6% | 91% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 6.0% | 15.0% | 18% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.15T CNY (≈$161.5B) | 79 | 79 | |
| 2 | 92.9B USD | 60 | 41 | |
| 3 | 75.3B USD | 57 | 39 | |
| 4 | 78.2B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 5 | 22.15T JPY (≈$150.6B) | 54 | 60 | |
| 6 | 101.3B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 6 | 147.5B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 8 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 48 | 41 | |
| 9 | 75.7B USD | 47 | 48 | |
| 10 | 180.3B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 11 | 91.3B USD | 44 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score