Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lockheed Martin Corporation
How Lockheed Martin Corporation stacks up
LMT · against 38 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #13 of 39 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including LMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 51.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 39 reported | 7.2% | 7.2% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 37 reported | 51.3% | 8.6% | 89% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 39 reported | 4.5% | 6.3% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 2 | 244.5B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 2 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 4 | 137.0B USD | 91 | 39 | |
| 4 | 98.8B USD | 91 | 47 | |
| 9 | 90.8B USD | 76 | 53 | |
| 10 | 110.4B EUR (≈$121.5B) | 73 | 52 | |
| 10 | 274.7B USD | 73 | 55 | |
| 12 | 286.8B USD | 71 | 52 | |
| 13 | 147.5B USD | 70 | 54 | |
| 14 | 152.1B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 15 | 101.3B USD | 65 | 65 | |
| 16 | 89.4B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 17 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 62 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score