Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LMT · against 473 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #448 of 474 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)82 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including LMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 451 reported | 2.34× | 0.63× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 430 reported | 0.10 | 1.12 | 97% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 473 reported | 1.19× | 1.79× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 209M USD | 100 | 46 | |
| 4 | 402M USD | 100 | 39 | |
| 5 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 444 | 793M USD | 2 | 27 | |
| 445 | 622M USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2 |
| 22 |
| 446 | 1.7B USD | 2 | 27 |
| 447 | 49.9B USD | 2 | 42 |
| 448 | 147.5B USD | 2 | 54 |
| 449 | 19.5B USD | 2 | 30 |
| 450 | 2.4B USD | 2 | 33 |
| 451 | 2M USD | 2 | 9 |
| 452 | Unavailable | 2 | 22 |