Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Limbach Holdings, Inc.
How Limbach Holdings, Inc. stacks up
LMB · against 953 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #347 of 954 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score85 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including LMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LMB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 956 reported | 5.0% | 3.4% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 965 reported | 9.3% | 6.9% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | 8.5% | 3.4% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 960 reported | 34.1% | 55.2% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LMB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 347 | 3.6B CNY (≈$508M) | 66 | 34 | |
| 347 | 87.8B JPY (≈$597M) | 66 | 73 | |
| 347 | 49.5B JPY (≈$337M) | 66 | 56 | |
| 347 | 553M USD | 66 | 72 | |
| 347 | 595M USD | 66 | 60 | |
| 347 | 793M USD | 66 | 27 | |
| 356 | 6.2B CNY (≈$863M) | 65 | 56 | |
| 356 | 2.4B CNY (≈$332M) | 65 | 75 | |
| 356 | 349M USD | 65 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score