Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lionsgate Studios Corp.
How Lionsgate Studios Corp. stacks up
LION · against 4 other Miscellaneous companies of similar size
Valuation
18/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #4 of 5 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including LION · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Miscellaneous peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.2% vs peer median 9.3%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.8% vs peer median 6.0%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 1.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LION, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LION | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 6 reported | Not reported | 11.4% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 6 reported | Not reported | -1.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | Not reported | 95.7% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LION| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 954.8B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 82 | 46 | |
| 2 | 6.6B USD | 69 | ||
| 3 | 3.2B USD | 24 | 45 | |
| 4 | 3.7B USD | 18 | 30 | |
| 5 | 387.9B INR (≈$4.7B) | 16 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score