Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LIME · against 752 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #269 of 753 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)82 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including LIME · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LIME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 740 reported | 0.20× | 0.38× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 727 reported | Not reported | 0.62 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 723 reported | 1.60× | 1.59× | 50% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 2 | 837M USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 3 | 157.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 5 | 138.8B JPY (≈$944M) | 99 | 78 | |
| 265 | 6.4B CNY (≈$895M) | 64 | 57 | |
| 266 | 6.2B CNY (≈$867M) | 64 | 45 | |
| 267 | 13.7B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 64 | 73 | |
| 268 | 10.5B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 64 | 51 | |
| 269 | 1.6B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 270 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 64 | 61 | |
| 271 | 128.8B JPY (≈$876M) | 64 | 69 | |
| 272 | 1.99T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 64 | 21 | |
| 273 | 170.9B INR (≈$2.1B) | 64 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score