Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Neutron Holdings, Inc.
How Neutron Holdings, Inc. stacks up
LIME · against 752 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #490 of 753 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score83 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including LIME · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 64% of peers. Return on invested capital: 4.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Return on assets is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.9% vs peer median 7.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LIME, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LIME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 725 reported | 4.5% | 7.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 755 reported | 7.9% | 7.9% | 51% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 712 reported | Not reported | 3.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 708 reported | Not reported | 8.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 758 reported | 38.7% | 25.3% | 79% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LIMEScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score