Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LIF · against 396 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #57 of 397 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including LIF · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LIF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 384 reported | 0.51× | 0.29× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 382 reported | 1.08 | 0.98 | 44% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 393 reported | 5.60× | 1.83× | 90% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 53 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 54 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 86 | 64 | |
| 55 | 197.3B TWD (≈$6.1B) | 85 | 78 | |
| 56 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 85 | 81 | |
| 57 | 3.7B USD | 84 | 71 | |
| 58 | 343.0B JPY (≈$2.3B) | 84 | 66 | |
| 59 | 1.9B USD | 84 | 26 | |
| 60 | 448.1B INR (≈$5.4B) | 83 | 69 | |
| 61 | 3.8B GBP (≈$5.0B) | 83 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score