Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Littelfuse, Inc.
How Littelfuse, Inc. stacks up
LFUS · against 235 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
32/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #187 of 236 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score30 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LFUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 2.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LFUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LFUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 235 reported | -0.1% | 2.9% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 238 reported | 5.4% | 4.8% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 4.2% | 3.2% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 232 reported | 25.0% | 21.2% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LFUSScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score