Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Littelfuse, Inc.
How Littelfuse, Inc. stacks up
LFUS · against 237 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #205 of 238 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including LFUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 73% of peers. Return on assets: -0.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 64% of peers. Return on invested capital: 2.9% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 62% of peers. Operating margin: 3.7% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LFUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LFUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 227 reported | 2.9% | 11.8% | 19% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 237 reported | 3.7% | 10.5% | 22% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 232 reported | -0.2% | 5.6% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 227 reported | -0.3% | 13.8% | 12% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 239 reported | 39.3% | 43.9% | 45% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LFUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.6B USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 1 | 863.2B INR (≈$10.4B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 7.3B USD | 99 | 68 | |
| 4 | 654.4B TWD (≈$20.3B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 76.2B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 201 | 7.4B USD | 34 | 36 | |
| 203 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 33 | 59 | |
| 203 | 12.8B USD | 33 | 53 | |
| 205 | 43.2B CNY (≈$6.1B) | 31 | 36 | |
| 205 | 10.5B USD | 31 | 36 | |
| 207 | 13.3B USD | 29 | 50 | |
| 207 | 10.4B USD | 29 | 41 | |
| 207 | 7.7B USD | 29 | 47 | |
| 210 | 328.8B TWD (≈$10.2B) | 27 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score