Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Liftoff Mobile, Inc.
How Liftoff Mobile, Inc. stacks up
LFTO · against 120 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #65 of 121 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including LFTO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.4% vs peer median 2.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 7.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.7% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LFTO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LFTO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 119 reported | 1.4% | 3.3% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 9.7% | 8.2% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 7.5% | 7.6% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | -0.2% | 48.1% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LFTO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 63 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 44 | 42 | |
| 63 | 3.2B USD | 44 | 57 | |
| 65 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 43 | 67 | |
| 65 | 2.0B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 65 | 2.5B USD | 43 | 43 | |
| 68 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 42 | 64 | |
| 68 | 2.1B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 70 | 17.2B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 41 | 60 | |
| 71 | 673.4B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 40 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score