Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LFST · against 230 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #169 of 231 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)24 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including LFST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LFST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 223 reported | 0.32× | 0.24× | 43% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 229 reported | 1.24 | 0.54 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 223 reported | 1.38× | 2.60× | 15% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 100 | |
| 165 | 24.9B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 34 | 38 | |
| 166 | 45.1B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 33 | 53 | |
| 167 | 9.2B USD | 33 | 39 | |
| 168 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 32 | 63 | |
| 169 | 5.1B USD | 32 | 52 | |
| 170 | 4.0B USD | 32 | 46 | |
| 171 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 31 | 39 | |
| 172 | 4.4B CHF (≈$5.1B) | 31 | 47 | |
| 173 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 29 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score