Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Levi Strauss & Co.
How Levi Strauss & Co. stacks up
LEVI · against 204 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
84/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #58 of 205 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score33 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including LEVI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 73% of peers. Operating margin: 11.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 86% of peers. Return on invested capital: 21.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 87% of peers. Return on assets: 8.5% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LEVI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LEVI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 196 reported | 21.1% | 11.1% | 74% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 206 reported | 11.3% | 10.1% | 58% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 195 reported | 8.5% | 5.0% | 75% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 185 reported | 26.2% | 15.8% | 72% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 206 reported | 61.6% | 33.3% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LEVI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 2 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 2 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 54 | 16.2B USD | 85 | 62 | |
| 58 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 84 | 58 | |
| 58 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 84 | 55 | |
| 58 | 8.2B AUD (≈$5.4B) | 84 | 58 | |
| 58 | 8.8B USD | 84 | 55 | |
| 58 | 4.7B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 63 | 5.1B USD | 83 | 57 | |
| 63 | 34.8B BRL (≈$6.3B) | 83 | 68 | |
| 65 | 37.4B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 82 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score