Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lennar Corporation
How Lennar Corporation stacks up
LEN · against 117 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #116 of 118 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including LEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -47.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: -8.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.5% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 118 reported | -8.0% | 8.4% | 3% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 107 reported | -47.6% | 9.3% | 8% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 117 reported | -1.5% | 10.3% | 9% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 38.3B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 112 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 16 | 66 | |
| 112 | 16.1B USD | 16 | 66 | |
| 114 | 16.9B USD | 14 | 11 | |
| 115 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 13 | 51 | |
| 116 | 20.5B USD | 12 | 50 | |
| 117 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 8 | 37 | |
| 118 | 22.1B EUR (≈$24.3B) | 4 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score