Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LEGN · against 253 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #130 of 254 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 51
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)33 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including LEGN · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LEGN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 249 reported | 0.23× | 0.24× | 52% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 251 reported | 0.40 | 0.54 | 61% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 243 reported | 3.04× | 2.49× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 2.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 126 | 3.1B USD | 52 | 53 | |
| 127 | 2.2B USD | 51 | 82 | |
| 128 | 21.6B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 129 | 4.5B USD | 51 | 33 | |
| 130 | 4.2B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 131 | 15.0B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 51 | 55 | |
| 132 | 31.3B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 50 | 65 | |
| 133 | 428.3B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 50 | 59 | |
| 134 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score