Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lands' End, Inc.
How Lands' End, Inc. stacks up
LE · against 447 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
76/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #118 of 448 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including LE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -26.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 91% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Earnings yield: 124.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 433 reported | 120.9% | 3.2% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 458 reported | 21.1% | 8.8% | 88% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | -26.0% | 6.8% | 2% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 435 reported | 172.1% | 70.7% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 114 | 335M USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 116 | 53.4B JPY (≈$363M) | 77 | 54 | |
| 116 | 242M AUD (≈$160M) | 77 | 49 | |
| 118 | 3.7B CNY (≈$512M) | 76 | 57 | |
| 118 | 282M USD | 76 | 63 | |
| 118 | 367M CHF (≈$422M) | 76 | 45 | |
| 121 | 2.5B CNY (≈$354M) | 75 | 73 | |
| 121 | 327.3B KRW (≈$236M) | 75 | 51 | |
| 121 | 1.2B SAR (≈$337M) | 75 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score