Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lands' End, Inc.
How Lands' End, Inc. stacks up
LE · against 459 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
62/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #111 of 460 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score47 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including LE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 83% of peers. Operating margin: 0.5% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 78% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 100% of peers. Return on assets: 37.0% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 432 reported | 1.1% | 4.2% | 33% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 459 reported | 0.5% | 4.3% | 24% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 438 reported | 37.0% | 2.0% | 100% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 429 reported | 97.9% | 4.6% | 100% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 461 reported | 48.6% | 26.2% | 81% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 2 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 97 | 82 | |
| 105 | 253M USD | 63 | 70 | |
| 105 | 26.5B INR (≈$317M) | 63 | 77 | |
| 111 | 3.3B CNY (≈$465M) | 62 | 48 | |
| 111 | 78.4B JPY (≈$533M) | 62 | 72 | |
| 111 | 282M USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 111 | 3.5B DKK (≈$521M) | 62 | 48 | |
| 115 | 3.2B CNY (≈$447M) | 61 | 65 | |
| 115 | 673M MYR (≈$148M) | 61 | 68 | |
| 115 | 201.0B KRW (≈$145M) | 61 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score