Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LCI Industries
How LCI Industries stacks up
LCII · against 382 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
77/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #95 of 383 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score44 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including LCII · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LCII, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LCII | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 383 reported | 8.5% | 5.5% | 77% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 391 reported | 12.9% | 9.9% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 11.6% | 6.3% | 77% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 385 reported | 57.8% | 50.4% | 54% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LCII| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 95 | 673.2B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 77 | 72 | |
| 95 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 77 | 57 | |
| 95 | 23.9B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 77 | 70 | |
| 95 | 1.8B CAD (≈$1.3B) | 77 | 50 | |
| 95 | 2.5B USD | 77 | 62 | |
| 103 | 12.9B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 76 | 66 | |
| 103 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 76 | 82 | |
| 103 | 2.7B USD | 76 | 69 | |
| 103 | 45.4B ZAR (≈$2.5B) | 76 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score