Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lucid Group, Inc.
How Lucid Group, Inc. stacks up
LCID · against 506 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #479 of 507 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including LCID · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -429.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -324.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -97.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LCID, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LCID | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 503 reported | -454.0% | 4.7% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 517 reported | -51.3% | 9.0% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -429.6% | 6.9% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 503 reported | -88.9% | 58.5% | 0% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LCID| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 479 | 893M USD | 6 | 21 | |
| 479 | 766M USD | 6 | 16 | |
| 479 | 7.8B SEK (≈$776M) | 6 | 11 | |
| 479 | 690M USD | 6 | 15 | |
| 479 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 479 | 1.4B USD | 6 | 41 | |
| 479 | 36.1B TRY (≈$1.1B) | 6 | 30 | |
| 479 | 2.2B USD | 6 | 14 | |
| 491 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 5 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score