Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LCID · against 509 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #487 of 510 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including LCID · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LCID | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 498 reported | 1.98× | 0.46× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 500 reported | 1.00 | 0.51 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 499 reported | 1.14× | 1.51× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.7B CNY (≈$659M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 4 | 5.4B CNY (≈$758M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 483 | 5.6B HKD (≈$711M) | 7 | 49 | |
| 484 | 2.3B USD | 6 | 43 | |
| 485 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 6 | 9 | |
| 486 | 239.6B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 6 | 42 | |
| 487 | 1.2B USD | 5 | 25 | |
| 488 | 5.4B CNY (≈$757M) | 5 | 17 | |
| 489 | 4.7B CNY (≈$660M) | 5 | 1 | |
| 490 | 8.6B NOK (≈$816M) | 4 | 49 | |
| 491 | 1.2B USD | 4 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score