Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lucid Group, Inc.
How Lucid Group, Inc. stacks up
LCID · against 518 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #513 of 519 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score33 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including LCID · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -50.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -220.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 99% of peers. Operating margin: -263.6% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LCID, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LCID | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 495 reported | -220.2% | 7.6% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 517 reported | -263.6% | 7.0% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 495 reported | -50.1% | 3.4% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 484 reported | -126.0% | 8.2% | 1% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 521 reported | -100.6% | 31.1% | 0% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LCID| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 513 | 4.7B CNY (≈$660M) | 0 | 1 | |
| 513 | 680M USD | 0 | 21 | |
| 513 | 763M USD | 0 | 19 | |
| 513 | 690M USD | 0 | 15 | |
| 513 | 1.2B USD | 0 | 25 | |
| 513 | 2.1B USD | 0 | 3 | |
| 513 | 720M USD | 0 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score