Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Liberty Global Ltd.
How Liberty Global Ltd. stacks up
LBTYA · against 115 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 116 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LBTYA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -106.0% vs peer median 2.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.8% vs peer median 7.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.5% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LBTYA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LBTYA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | -106.0% | 2.8% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 11.5% | 7.6% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | -8.8% | 6.2% | 6% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | 317.4% | 45.0% | 100% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LBTYA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 72 | 1.7B USD | 37 | 54 | |
| 74 | 4.6B USD | 36 | 39 | |
| 74 | 2.3B USD | 36 | 33 | |
| 76 | 3.6B SGD (≈$2.8B) | 35 | 48 | |
| 76 | 2.9B USD | 35 | 41 | |
| 76 | 29.8B SEK (≈$3.0B) | 35 | 29 | |
| 79 | 20.8B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 34 | 60 | |
| 80 | 11.4B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 33 | 68 | |
| 80 | 3.8B USD | 33 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score