Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Liberty Global Ltd.
How Liberty Global Ltd. stacks up
LBTYA · against 142 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #97 of 143 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LBTYA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -106.0% vs peer median 2.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.8% vs peer median 7.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.5% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LBTYA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LBTYA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -106.0% | 3.0% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 11.5% | 9.3% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | -8.8% | 7.5% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 317.4% | 45.9% | 97% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LBTYA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 743M USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 92 | 22.8B USD | 37 | 45 | |
| 94 | 916M USD | 36 | 19 | |
| 94 | 4.6B USD | 36 | 39 | |
| 94 | 2.3B USD | 36 | 33 | |
| 97 | 2.9B USD | 35 | 41 | |
| 98 | 1.2B USD | 34 | 36 | |
| 98 | 324M USD | 34 | 25 | |
| 98 | 649M USD | 34 | 46 | |
| 101 | 3.8B USD | 33 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score