Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SEALSQ Corp
How SEALSQ Corp stacks up
LAES · against 501 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
3/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #462 of 502 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score89 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including LAES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 3?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 98% of peers. Operating margin: -218.1% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on invested capital: -68.0% vs peer median 6.8%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on assets: -6.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LAES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 474 reported | -68.0% | 7.4% | 5% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 501 reported | -218.1% | 6.9% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | -6.8% | 3.4% | 16% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 465 reported | -12.3% | 9.2% | 18% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 505 reported | 52.6% | 51.0% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LAES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.02T USD | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 95.9B USD | 99 | 67 | |
| 1 | 522.9B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 15.3B USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 462 | 11.8B USD | 3 | 40 | |
| 462 | 1.5B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score