Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ladder Capital Corp
How Ladder Capital Corp stacks up
LADR · against 228 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #169 of 229 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including LADR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.2% vs peer median 5.4%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.9% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LADR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LADR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 247 reported | 4.6% | 5.9% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 224 reported | Not reported | 5.6% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 90 reported | 8.9% | 7.4% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 123.7% | 113.6% | 58% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LADR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 139.5B JPY (≈$949M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 3 | 5.8B HKD (≈$737M) | 97 | 86 | |
| 3 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 163 | 1.1B AUD (≈$737M) | 28 | 52 | |
| 166 | 217.5B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 27 | 43 | |
| 166 | 2.0B USD | 27 | 40 | |
| 166 | 1.3B USD | 27 | 14 | |
| 169 | 1.2B USD | 26 | 21 | |
| 169 | 71.4B THB (≈$2.0B) | 26 | 54 | |
| 169 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 45 | |
| 172 | 667M USD | 25 | 59 | |
| 172 | 903M SGD (≈$686M) | 25 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score